Are App Developers Really Trying to Rip You Off?
TL;DR
- The Apple App Store is a tightly controlled ecosystem, not an open marketplace
- Developers often have limited choices in how they charge and explain pricing
- One-time purchases, subscriptions, and in-app purchases serve different purposes
- Most developers are not trying to be deceptive—they are working within Apple’s rules
⸻
When people download an app from the Apple App Store, they often assume the developer has full control over how the app works, how it charges money, and how it communicates with users. In reality, the App Store imposes significant constraints that shape those decisions.
Apple’s goal is consistency, security, and trust. That design choice benefits users in many ways, but it also means developers must operate inside a predefined box.
What Apple provides
- A centralized, trusted marketplace
- App review for security and policy compliance
- Built-in payment processing and refunds
- Global distribution without custom infrastructure
These are real advantages, especially for small developers. A single person can publish an app that reaches millions of users worldwide. Apple handles payments, taxes in many regions, fraud prevention, and updates.
At the same time, this centralized model limits flexibility—especially around pricing and monetization.
One common misconception is that every app could simply charge once and then be “free forever.” While that model does exist, it only works in certain situations.
One-time purchase apps
- You pay once and unlock everything
- Best suited for apps that are largely “finished” products
- Difficult to sustain if the app requires ongoing updates, servers, or support
For simple tools or standalone utilities, a one-time purchase can make sense. But many modern apps continue to evolve. Operating systems change, security requirements change, and users expect improvements over time. Supporting that ongoing work costs money.
This is where subscriptions and in-app purchases come in.
Subscriptions
- Intended for ongoing or continuously delivered value
- Common for content, services, or regularly updated features
- Managed entirely through Apple’s subscription system
Subscriptions are often misunderstood as greedy or unnecessary. In practice, they are the only viable way for some apps to exist long-term—especially those that rely on cloud services, frequent updates, or external costs.
Importantly, Apple controls how subscriptions are presented, renewed, canceled, and refunded. Developers cannot freely redesign that experience, even if they want to explain it differently.
In-app purchases
- Allow users to buy additional features, content, or upgrades
- Can support continued development without requiring a full subscription
- Still governed by Apple’s rules and payment system
In-app purchases are often used as a middle ground. They allow developers to improve an app over time and fund that work, while still letting users choose what they want to pay for. This model is especially common in apps that grow gradually or add optional features.
From the outside, these choices can sometimes look confusing or inconsistent. It’s easy to assume the developer is intentionally making things complicated.
In many cases, that’s simply not true.
Why apps sometimes feel restrictive
- Developers must use Apple’s payment system
- Alternatives cannot be freely advertised
- Pricing explanations are limited
- Communication with users is regulated
Many apps are built by very small teams, or even a single developer. These people are balancing platform rules, user expectations, technical complexity, and ongoing costs. Most are trying to be fair, sustainable, and compliant—not deceptive.
In short, the Apple App Store offers safety and consistency at the cost of flexibility. When an app’s pricing or behavior feels constrained, it’s often because the platform itself is constrained.
Understanding that context makes it easier to judge apps—and developers—more fairly.